Frozen Bank Account: Can a Solicitor Get It Unfrozen, and What Will It Cost?

Category: Frozen Accounts Author: Bidunbao editors Updated: 2026-10-14 ≈7 min read
Illustration: a person in a suit beside a pair of scales, with a clamped bank card on the left

Your bank has told you an account freezing order now sits on your current account, and the money stuck in it came from people who bought USDT from you. Before you ring anyone back, you are wondering whether to pay a solicitor. No solicitor can unfreeze the account. Under section 303Z4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, it is the court that "may at any time vary or set aside an account freezing order", on an application made by an enforcement officer or by "any person affected by the order". If the frozen money is in your account, that second group includes you, so you can apply yourself. A solicitor can make the same application for you; the decision stays with the court.

On cost, the Solicitors Regulation Authority's Code of Conduct does not fix a fee. What it fixes is information: standard 8.7 says clients should get "the best possible information about how their matter will be priced" and about "the likely overall cost of the matter", at the start and as it goes on. And if the police question you at a station, GOV.UK is plain that legal advice there is free.

Can a solicitor get a frozen account unfrozen?

Only if you mean "ask the court on your behalf". Start by confirming what you are dealing with. A bank sometimes blocks an account on its own, and that is a different conversation with different people, and telling a bank block from a court order takes a few checks. This guide is about a court order under the Proceeds of Crime Act in England and Wales.

Section 303Z4(1) reads: "The relevant court may at any time vary or set aside an account freezing order on an application made by— (a) an enforcement officer, or (b) any person affected by the order." Subsection (3) adds that before doing either, the court must give the parties "an opportunity to be heard", and give the same opportunity "to any person who may be affected by its decision".

So the route is the same whoever walks it. A solicitor brings the application, argues it, and the court decides. Anyone who promises a guaranteed release is promising a court's decision they do not control, and we would treat that promise as a reason to walk away.

Applying to the court yourself

The statute does not say an application has to come through a solicitor. "Any person affected by the order" is the whole test on the face of subsection (1).

What makes an application worth hearing is the paper behind it. For a P2P seller that means the order history for each payment the bank flagged, the buyer's payment details, the chat log from each trade, and bank statements for the same dates, lined up in date order so a judge can follow one payment from order to receipt.

One small thing that saves time: keep the order's paperwork and the name of the court that made it next to that bundle. If you do not yet know which authority obtained the order, start by finding out who froze the account.

When paying for a solicitor makes sense

Our view: if your records are clean and the only problem is money sitting in the account, try putting the case in order yourself first. The picture changes when you are no longer just the account holder but someone the police want to talk to.

Where you areWhat the official page saysWhat we would do
The account is frozen; nobody has asked to interview yous.303Z4: any person affected by the order may apply to the courtBuild the evidence bundle and consider applying yourself
You are asked to attend a police station for questioningGOV.UK: "You have the right to free legal advice (legal aid) if you're questioned at a police station."Ask for the duty solicitor before answering questions
You have been arrested or chargedGOV.UK: "There's a different way to get legal aid if you've been arrested or charged with a crime."Get criminal advice; the freezing order is now part of a bigger matter
The court hearing is contested and a large sum is at stakes.303Z4(3): the parties get an opportunity to be heardPaying for representation is a reasonable choice here; get the cost information first

The duty solicitor is worth knowing about by name. GOV.UK says to "ask for the police station's 'duty solicitor' – they're available 24 hours a day and independent of the police". You do not need to have found a firm in advance.

Before an interview
Talking through your P2P trades with an officer without advice, because you feel you have nothing to hide, is the moment most worth pausing. The advice at the station costs you nothing.

What it costs, and what you are entitled to be told

There is no published scale for frozen-account work, and the SRA Code does not set one. Firms price it themselves. The full text of standard 8.7: "You ensure that clients receive the best possible information about how their matter will be priced and, both at the time of engagement and when appropriate as their matter progresses, about the likely overall cost of the matter and any costs incurred."

Read that as a list of questions you are allowed to ask before you sign anything: how will this be priced, what is the likely overall cost, and will you tell me when that estimate changes? Ask for the answer in writing. A firm that will not give a likely overall cost for a defined piece of work, such as preparing and making an application under s.303Z4, has told you something too.

Legal aid is the other line to check. GOV.UK says "Legal aid can help with the costs of legal advice" and that "You can check if you can get legal aid for your type of problem." We have not set out the financial tests here; the checker on GOV.UK is the place to run your own situation.

Check the solicitor is real before you pay

Not everyone who offers to sort out a freeze is a solicitor, whatever the letterhead says. The SRA has a register for exactly this: "Check whether somebody is a solicitor and find where they work." Search the person and the firm before any money moves. An empty search is a warning, not a technicality. The SRA's wording: "No results means that we have no record of a firm or person matching your query, so it is not safe to assume the firm or person you are looking for is regulated by us."

The SRA also publishes scam alerts, which in its words "warn you about people who call themselves solicitors but are not". If someone contacted you first, offering to sort the freeze, read that list as well. If the offer came from an unfreezing service rather than a firm, read what tends to happen after people pay one first.

How this was put together
Written from the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the published pages of the SRA and GOV.UK, read on 14 October 2026, not from a case we handled. We have not looked at any firm's prices, so this guide names no figures. Your own papers, the court and your solicitor's advice govern what happens in your case.

Sources (checked 2026-10-14): Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, section 303Z4 (who may apply to vary or set aside an account freezing order, and the opportunity to be heard) · SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors (standard 8.7, information on pricing and likely overall cost) · SRA Solicitors Register and SRA scam alerts (checking a solicitor, and what an empty result means) · GOV.UK, Legal aid and GOV.UK, Legal advice at the police station. Rules differ by country; the papers you receive and your local rules govern. Independent guide, not a bank, police force, court, regulator or exchange channel; general information only, not legal advice. We only cover lawful self-protection, and we do not explain how to evade law enforcement or move funds.

Related: Paid unfreezing services · Bank block vs legal freeze · Frozen by an authority elsewhere · First steps when frozen